<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Scot’s Newsletter Blog</title>
	<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com</link>
	<description>Operating systems. Broadband. Issues. Reviews ... tech info you can use.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eudora Users: Odysseus Is Probably Our Best Hope by Scot</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-514</guid>
		<description>I had a similar conversation with Matt Milano in email, and he convinced me that he believes IDS is protected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar conversation with Matt Milano in email, and he convinced me that he believes IDS is protected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eudora Users: Odysseus Is Probably Our Best Hope by ody2sad</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>ody2sad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-513</guid>
		<description>Just to follow up, I've had some private communication back and forth with Matt Milano now. He assures me that the bankruptcy is his personal situation, that it doesn't affect IDS, and that he was "shocked" that the listing I pointed to even mentioned the company. After a little research, I'm not convinced the situation is that clear-cut about it given that he is the sole legal "member" of IDS as far as the State of Kentucky is concerned. So I don't really know what to think at this point, but am going to give him the benefit of the doubt and adopt a "wait and see" attitude. 

He has sent me a link for a beta download (which I unfortunately can't use because it's the wrong version for me) and indicates that his forums will be updated and the beta release links made public shortly. 

Hopefully this will all work out the way we all want it to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to follow up, I&#8217;ve had some private communication back and forth with Matt Milano now. He assures me that the bankruptcy is his personal situation, that it doesn&#8217;t affect IDS, and that he was &#8220;shocked&#8221; that the listing I pointed to even mentioned the company. After a little research, I&#8217;m not convinced the situation is that clear-cut about it given that he is the sole legal &#8220;member&#8221; of IDS as far as the State of Kentucky is concerned. So I don&#8217;t really know what to think at this point, but am going to give him the benefit of the doubt and adopt a &#8220;wait and see&#8221; attitude. </p>
<p>He has sent me a link for a beta download (which I unfortunately can&#8217;t use because it&#8217;s the wrong version for me) and indicates that his forums will be updated and the beta release links made public shortly. </p>
<p>Hopefully this will all work out the way we all want it to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eudora Users: Odysseus Is Probably Our Best Hope by ody2sad</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>ody2sad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-512</guid>
		<description>I wanted to post in the IDS forums and ask about it before saying anything anywhere else, but haven't been able to get the registration approval yet. Apparently that requires manual approval by a person first. Same with the Qualcomm Eudora forums, I'm registered but not yet "authorized" and so can't post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to post in the IDS forums and ask about it before saying anything anywhere else, but haven&#8217;t been able to get the registration approval yet. Apparently that requires manual approval by a person first. Same with the Qualcomm Eudora forums, I&#8217;m registered but not yet &#8220;authorized&#8221; and so can&#8217;t post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eudora Users: Odysseus Is Probably Our Best Hope by Scot</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-511</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is disappointing. Has someone posted this on the IDS forums to get Matt Milano's reaction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is disappointing. Has someone posted this on the IDS forums to get Matt Milano&#8217;s reaction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eudora Users: Odysseus Is Probably Our Best Hope by ody2sad</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>ody2sad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-510</guid>
		<description>As excited as I was about Odysseus when I recently found out about it, unfortunately it looks like it's unlikely to happen- and the developer(s) are perhaps not being 100% forthcoming about the situation as well.

The developer and company (Matt Milano, Infinity Data Systems in Georgetown, KY) apparently have recently filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. You can find Matt and Infinity's name under the Chapter 7 listings for Lexington here: http://www.kentucky.com/101/story/375594.html

Oddly enough, this listing was posted on Apr 14, the day before IDS started accepting pre-registration payments for Odysseus (at least according to IDS's website, the pre-reg started  Apr 15). It also seems odd that, the last few days, they have been promising in their forums that they have an open beta done that will be posted shortly and was delayed last week primarily due to a "server upgrade".

By the way, Chapter 7 means that a trustee is appointed and assets are sold off.

I'm sad to be the bearer of bad news, and really dissapointed if Odysseus doesn't happen. But I think people are getting their hopes up for nothing, at minimum. And worst case, people may be sending in their pre-registration money for something they might not see for a very long time if ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As excited as I was about Odysseus when I recently found out about it, unfortunately it looks like it&#8217;s unlikely to happen- and the developer(s) are perhaps not being 100% forthcoming about the situation as well.</p>
<p>The developer and company (Matt Milano, Infinity Data Systems in Georgetown, KY) apparently have recently filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. You can find Matt and Infinity&#8217;s name under the Chapter 7 listings for Lexington here: <a href="http://www.kentucky.com/101/story/375594.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kentucky.com/101/story/375594.html</a></p>
<p>Oddly enough, this listing was posted on Apr 14, the day before IDS started accepting pre-registration payments for Odysseus (at least according to IDS&#8217;s website, the pre-reg started  Apr 15). It also seems odd that, the last few days, they have been promising in their forums that they have an open beta done that will be posted shortly and was delayed last week primarily due to a &#8220;server upgrade&#8221;.</p>
<p>By the way, Chapter 7 means that a trustee is appointed and assets are sold off.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sad to be the bearer of bad news, and really dissapointed if Odysseus doesn&#8217;t happen. But I think people are getting their hopes up for nothing, at minimum. And worst case, people may be sending in their pre-registration money for something they might not see for a very long time if ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Firewall Software of 2008: Online Armor by Scot</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/24/the-best-firewall-software-of-2008-online-armor/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/24/the-best-firewall-software-of-2008-online-armor/#comment-509</guid>
		<description>Makes sense, Allen. In earlier versions of OA there were also issues with performance of downloads with P2P products. I believe that's been fixed, but your application is not that common. I'd do the same thing if I were you.

If you find a better firewall for your application, I'd be interested to know about that. Have you tried Comodo? I'm also wondering whether you use or have tried Eset NOD32 (not the firewall, just the antimalware/virus product)?

-- Scot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense, Allen. In earlier versions of OA there were also issues with performance of downloads with P2P products. I believe that&#8217;s been fixed, but your application is not that common. I&#8217;d do the same thing if I were you.</p>
<p>If you find a better firewall for your application, I&#8217;d be interested to know about that. Have you tried Comodo? I&#8217;m also wondering whether you use or have tried Eset NOD32 (not the firewall, just the antimalware/virus product)?</p>
<p>&#8211; Scot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Firewall Software of 2008: Online Armor by Allen Moore</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/24/the-best-firewall-software-of-2008-online-armor/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/24/the-best-firewall-software-of-2008-online-armor/#comment-508</guid>
		<description>My trial period for Online Armor just ran out and I've decided to evaluate other firewalls. I use my machine to develop embedded software and I make heavy use of compilers. With OA active, the build time for my main project jumped from about 15 seconds to over two minutes. It also wanted to alert every time I ran the same 'grep' from a different directory. Turning off these alerts was like playing Whack-a-Mole. All I need is a program that monitors what comes in and out of my box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My trial period for Online Armor just ran out and I&#8217;ve decided to evaluate other firewalls. I use my machine to develop embedded software and I make heavy use of compilers. With OA active, the build time for my main project jumped from about 15 seconds to over two minutes. It also wanted to alert every time I ran the same &#8216;grep&#8217; from a different directory. Turning off these alerts was like playing Whack-a-Mole. All I need is a program that monitors what comes in and out of my box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Search of a New Webhost by pja</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/01/in-search-of-a-new-webhost/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>pja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/01/in-search-of-a-new-webhost/#comment-506</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I have been using A Small Orange (http://asmallorange.com/) for several years now.  The service is good, with only several minor problems (generally server outages).  The range of features is very extensive and the price is reasonable.

Highly recommended.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I have been using A Small Orange (http://asmallorange.com/) for several years now.  The service is good, with only several minor problems (generally server outages).  The range of features is very extensive and the price is reasonable.</p>
<p>Highly recommended.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eudora Users: Odysseus Is Probably Our Best Hope by Scot</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-505</guid>
		<description>I've been considering an update on Odysseus. &lt;a href="http://www.infinitydatasystems.com/odysseus/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Infinity Data Systems&lt;/a&gt; is now saying that the product code-named Odysseus will ship on May 12. A public beta should be released in the very near future just prior to the shipping product being released. Check out pricing, FAQ, and screenshots at the link above. But for more detail, see the &lt;a href="http://www.infinitydatasystems.com/forums/" rel="nofollow"&gt;forums&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been considering an update on Odysseus. <a href="http://www.infinitydatasystems.com/odysseus/index.html" rel="nofollow">Infinity Data Systems</a> is now saying that the product code-named Odysseus will ship on May 12. A public beta should be released in the very near future just prior to the shipping product being released. Check out pricing, FAQ, and screenshots at the link above. But for more detail, see the <a href="http://www.infinitydatasystems.com/forums/" rel="nofollow">forums</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eudora Users: Odysseus Is Probably Our Best Hope by JanCounselor</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>JanCounselor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/21/eudora-users-odysseus-is-probably-our-best-hope/#comment-504</guid>
		<description>Just finding all this on Odysseus today.  Please, does anyone know if this software is out of Beta testing, and if it's being made available for the PC.  Big disappointment to discover Eudora has left us high and dry!

Thanks for any current info.  I've explored on Google and gotten nowhere since something in February '08.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just finding all this on Odysseus today.  Please, does anyone know if this software is out of Beta testing, and if it&#8217;s being made available for the PC.  Big disappointment to discover Eudora has left us high and dry!</p>
<p>Thanks for any current info.  I&#8217;ve explored on Google and gotten nowhere since something in February &#8216;08.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Search of a New Webhost by JanCounselor</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/01/in-search-of-a-new-webhost/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>JanCounselor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/01/in-search-of-a-new-webhost/#comment-503</guid>
		<description>Recommended to me by a friend who knows, (one of two), and I've been with them since mid-January, and though not yet completed my large transition, I've had good vibes and experience with Brent Oxley, the boss at Hostgator.com.  He communicates with me directly, usually within 24 hours, and ends every email with "Thank you for allowing me to work with you!"  Now that's a service attitude! 

I didn't research and am not technical enough to know all your parameters, but feel sure you'd want to do that yourself.  Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recommended to me by a friend who knows, (one of two), and I&#8217;ve been with them since mid-January, and though not yet completed my large transition, I&#8217;ve had good vibes and experience with Brent Oxley, the boss at Hostgator.com.  He communicates with me directly, usually within 24 hours, and ends every email with &#8220;Thank you for allowing me to work with you!&#8221;  Now that&#8217;s a service attitude! </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t research and am not technical enough to know all your parameters, but feel sure you&#8217;d want to do that yourself.  Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Search of a New Webhost by chriscjd</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/01/in-search-of-a-new-webhost/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>chriscjd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/01/in-search-of-a-new-webhost/#comment-502</guid>
		<description>I wish you luck with your search, there are so many out there...

I use, and have switched a number of my clients over to: http://www.1and1.com/?k_id=9025464

I have been using the Linux Business Package for years now, which provides lots of space/features at a great price. 

Check it out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish you luck with your search, there are so many out there&#8230;</p>
<p>I use, and have switched a number of my clients over to: <a href="http://www.1and1.com/?k_id=9025464" rel="nofollow">http://www.1and1.com/?k_id=9025464</a></p>
<p>I have been using the Linux Business Package for years now, which provides lots of space/features at a great price. </p>
<p>Check it out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Firewall Software of 2008: Online Armor by Mamado</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/24/the-best-firewall-software-of-2008-online-armor/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Mamado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/24/the-best-firewall-software-of-2008-online-armor/#comment-501</guid>
		<description>I highly appreciate all what you did which comfort me further in my opinion about your professionalism and the high quality of this forum.

What you said is very clear for me and I cannot ask you for more than that. I believe I have seen also in Tall Emu site, that tweaking the white list for the originally allowed programs is a part of the advanced mode available only in their paid version, I'll double check on that. 

So, Online Armor will not do for me any better in the time being, mainly as I cannot buy on line (NOD, OA, or any other software because of the hard currency transfer regulation in my country, but this is another issue which has nothing to do with computing and I don't want to bother you with that too). I will continue to follow up the evolution of firewall softwares to make the change as soon as I have the confirmation of the availability of better and more suitable version.

So thanks a lot and I remain grateful for your valuable help.

Regards
Mamado</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I highly appreciate all what you did which comfort me further in my opinion about your professionalism and the high quality of this forum.</p>
<p>What you said is very clear for me and I cannot ask you for more than that. I believe I have seen also in Tall Emu site, that tweaking the white list for the originally allowed programs is a part of the advanced mode available only in their paid version, I&#8217;ll double check on that. </p>
<p>So, Online Armor will not do for me any better in the time being, mainly as I cannot buy on line (NOD, OA, or any other software because of the hard currency transfer regulation in my country, but this is another issue which has nothing to do with computing and I don&#8217;t want to bother you with that too). I will continue to follow up the evolution of firewall softwares to make the change as soon as I have the confirmation of the availability of better and more suitable version.</p>
<p>So thanks a lot and I remain grateful for your valuable help.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Mamado</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Firewall Software of 2008: Online Armor by Scot</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/24/the-best-firewall-software-of-2008-online-armor/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/24/the-best-firewall-software-of-2008-online-armor/#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Mamado,

I understand that people are coming to me as a trusted source of information. I am unbiased, and I will do my best to interpret this complex area, but when it comes to figuring out issues among multiple products in two different product categories -- I cannot speak definitively without doing lots of research testing and cross-testing products against each other. 

My bet is that you might be able to get more information about this issue in the &lt;a href="http://www.wilderssecurity.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wilders Forums&lt;/a&gt;, which has numerous product-specific forums. I consider it to be one of the best sources of security information on the Internet -- although, like any forums, you have to keep in mind that it often represents opinions, not necessarily facts. Still, the level of expertise of many of the posters at Wilder's is very high.

That said, my understanding is that the use of a local proxy in more and more antivirus products affects HIPS-based products more or less across the board -- although some may have implemented workarounds or fixes already. My advice about this has been crystal clear: Use NOD32 2.7. It doesn't use its own proxy, and it works great. Eset continues to sell 2.7 -- and there's a link to the page where this is shown in the article this comment thread is linked to.

About your second question, and this is perhaps the most important point: &lt;strong&gt;Both OA full and OA Free offer the same exact setting that Mike Nash referred to that disables the pre-trusted or whitelist applications in Online Armor&lt;/strong&gt;. You'll find it under Options &gt; Firewall, and the setting is a check box at the very top of that dialog labeled "Automatically allow Trusted programs to access the Internet."

So, no, you don't have to buy the full version to control this feature. I think I may have inadvertently given you that impression. My point was that, in general, there's a notable increase of control in the paid version -- and that, based on your questions, you would prefer that version. Not that you needed to buy the paid version in order to turn off the pre-trusted whitelist.

Note that, if you turn off this whitelist, you will be faced with a far more intense blizzard of pop-ups in the early going after you first install Online Armor. Although it is implemented a bit differently, Comodo also uses a whitelist. And many other, newer HIPS products do the same. This is not a new thing, though. Norton Personal Firewall and other products of its ilk did the same thing with their more rudimentary application control modules six or seven years ago. This is not unusual, and not considered poor security -- so long as the HIPS is properly identifying the applications it pre-approves.

-- Scot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mamado,</p>
<p>I understand that people are coming to me as a trusted source of information. I am unbiased, and I will do my best to interpret this complex area, but when it comes to figuring out issues among multiple products in two different product categories &#8212; I cannot speak definitively without doing lots of research testing and cross-testing products against each other. </p>
<p>My bet is that you might be able to get more information about this issue in the <a href="http://www.wilderssecurity.com/" rel="nofollow">Wilders Forums</a>, which has numerous product-specific forums. I consider it to be one of the best sources of security information on the Internet &#8212; although, like any forums, you have to keep in mind that it often represents opinions, not necessarily facts. Still, the level of expertise of many of the posters at Wilder&#8217;s is very high.</p>
<p>That said, my understanding is that the use of a local proxy in more and more antivirus products affects HIPS-based products more or less across the board &#8212; although some may have implemented workarounds or fixes already. My advice about this has been crystal clear: Use NOD32 2.7. It doesn&#8217;t use its own proxy, and it works great. Eset continues to sell 2.7 &#8212; and there&#8217;s a link to the page where this is shown in the article this comment thread is linked to.</p>
<p>About your second question, and this is perhaps the most important point: <strong>Both OA full and OA Free offer the same exact setting that Mike Nash referred to that disables the pre-trusted or whitelist applications in Online Armor</strong>. You&#8217;ll find it under Options > Firewall, and the setting is a check box at the very top of that dialog labeled &#8220;Automatically allow Trusted programs to access the Internet.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, no, you don&#8217;t have to buy the full version to control this feature. I think I may have inadvertently given you that impression. My point was that, in general, there&#8217;s a notable increase of control in the paid version &#8212; and that, based on your questions, you would prefer that version. Not that you needed to buy the paid version in order to turn off the pre-trusted whitelist.</p>
<p>Note that, if you turn off this whitelist, you will be faced with a far more intense blizzard of pop-ups in the early going after you first install Online Armor. Although it is implemented a bit differently, Comodo also uses a whitelist. And many other, newer HIPS products do the same. This is not a new thing, though. Norton Personal Firewall and other products of its ilk did the same thing with their more rudimentary application control modules six or seven years ago. This is not unusual, and not considered poor security &#8212; so long as the HIPS is properly identifying the applications it pre-approves.</p>
<p>&#8211; Scot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best Firewall Software of 2008: Online Armor by Mamado</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/24/the-best-firewall-software-of-2008-online-armor/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Mamado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/24/the-best-firewall-software-of-2008-online-armor/#comment-499</guid>
		<description>I summarize below what I understand from Mike Nash about my concerns, to confirm that I did not misunderstood him and to help other users to be on the full and right pictures about the raised problems.
1. Due to local proxy facility of some AV software (KAV, Avast, NOD32,..) Online Armor will not prevent any program from connecting to the Internet as the AV allow the programs to proxy their Internet connection.
Mike Nash promised: "We’re probably going to add loopback protection into the free version soon as more and more AV are now doing this."
Therefore in presence of most AV softwares, the firewall function of Online Armor (free and paid versions) is disabled unless OA add loopback protection, what they are propably going to do soon. 
2. OA will allow all what they consider safe programs to connect to Internet. This to reduce popups and the number of questions the user has to answer. To override the “auto allowing of trusted apps to access the Internet” user has to purchase the paid version.

Please correct me if I am wrong.
On the other hand I fully agree with Scot that the paid version is the best choice.

Regards 
Mamado</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I summarize below what I understand from Mike Nash about my concerns, to confirm that I did not misunderstood him and to help other users to be on the full and right pictures about the raised problems.<br />
1. Due to local proxy facility of some AV software (KAV, Avast, NOD32,..) Online Armor will not prevent any program from connecting to the Internet as the AV allow the programs to proxy their Internet connection.<br />
Mike Nash promised: &#8220;We’re probably going to add loopback protection into the free version soon as more and more AV are now doing this.&#8221;<br />
Therefore in presence of most AV softwares, the firewall function of Online Armor (free and paid versions) is disabled unless OA add loopback protection, what they are propably going to do soon.<br />
2. OA will allow all what they consider safe programs to connect to Internet. This to reduce popups and the number of questions the user has to answer. To override the “auto allowing of trusted apps to access the Internet” user has to purchase the paid version.</p>
<p>Please correct me if I am wrong.<br />
On the other hand I fully agree with Scot that the paid version is the best choice.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Mamado</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
