<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Scot’s Newsletter Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com</link>
	<description>Operating systems. Broadband. Issues. Reviews ... tech info you can use.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:35:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac vs. PC Cost Analysis &#8211; Round 1 by The Apple Tax</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/06/05/mac-vs-pc-cost-analysis-round-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4306</link>
		<dc:creator>The Apple Tax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=53#comment-4306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] one considers the long list of features included in every Apple product, the price becomes a very competitive value. But are we really comparing Apples to Apples? If all of the hardware specifications are the same, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one considers the long list of features included in every Apple product, the price becomes a very competitive value. But are we really comparing Apples to Apples? If all of the hardware specifications are the same, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eset&#8217;s Nod32 2.7: Best Antivirus Product of 2007 by Scot’s Newsletter Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Best Firewall Software of 2008: Online Armor</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/02/04/esets-nod32-27-best-antivirus-product-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-4222</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot’s Newsletter Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Best Firewall Software of 2008: Online Armor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/02/04/esets-nod32-27-best-antivirus-product-of-2007/#comment-4222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] while a good product, is not as good as Eset&#8217;s NOD32 2.7. Because I named NOD32 2.7 the Best Antivirus Product of 2007, I have tested Online Armor extensively with NOD32 running. I&#8217;ve experienced zero [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while a good product, is not as good as Eset&#8217;s NOD32 2.7. Because I named NOD32 2.7 the Best Antivirus Product of 2007, I have tested Online Armor extensively with NOD32 running. I&#8217;ve experienced zero [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Increasing Priority: Fuel-Efficient Automobiles by Scot’s Newsletter Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Toyota&#8217;s Next-Gen Hybrid Tech and 2009 Prius</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/05/23/an-increasing-priority-fuel-efficient-automobiles/comment-page-1/#comment-4217</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot’s Newsletter Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Toyota&#8217;s Next-Gen Hybrid Tech and 2009 Prius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/05/23/an-increasing-priority-fuel-efficient-automobiles/#comment-4217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Blog Operating systems. Broadband. Issues. Reviews &#8230; tech info you can use.      &#171; An Increasing Priority: Fuel-Efficient Automobiles More Scuttlebutt on the 2009 Prius [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blog Operating systems. Broadband. Issues. Reviews &#8230; tech info you can use.      &laquo; An Increasing Priority: Fuel-Efficient Automobiles More Scuttlebutt on the 2009 Prius [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: Corsair 2GB Flash Padlock USB Stick by Scot’s Newsletter Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Corsair Flash Padlock Redux, Lexar, and IronKey</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/09/10/review-corsair-2gb-flash-padlock-usb-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-4216</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot’s Newsletter Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Corsair Flash Padlock Redux, Lexar, and IronKey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=72#comment-4216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] this month I wrote a review of Corsair&#8217;s 2GB Flash Padlock USB stick. The USB drive is unique to my knowledge in that it has push-buttons that create a padlock, so the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this month I wrote a review of Corsair&#8217;s 2GB Flash Padlock USB stick. The USB drive is unique to my knowledge in that it has push-buttons that create a padlock, so the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A View of Our Automotive Future by Scot’s Newsletter Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Automotive Future: Clean Diesel</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/09/10/a-view-of-our-automotive-future/comment-page-1/#comment-4215</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot’s Newsletter Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Automotive Future: Clean Diesel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=68#comment-4215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] essay a few weeks back called A View of Our Automotive Future stirred up a lot of controversy and generated a lot of reader email. It&#8217;s easy to forget that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] essay a few weeks back called A View of Our Automotive Future stirred up a lot of controversy and generated a lot of reader email. It&#8217;s easy to forget that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Turning off the SNB Newsletter by muradsdin</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2010/05/26/turning-off-the-snb-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-4128</link>
		<dc:creator>muradsdin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=457#comment-4128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice article thanks for sharing it...............]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article thanks for sharing it&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Turning off the SNB Newsletter by Scot</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2010/05/26/turning-off-the-snb-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-3811</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 12:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=457#comment-3811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks. From the tenor of the many emails I&#039;ve been getting in response to this newsletter, you might think I was making a big change. Truth is, since I hadn&#039;t mailed the newsletter in a long time, the decision was effectively made without foresight or intention. My belated decision to pull the plug was little more than a confirmation of the obvious.

I still plan to write here and at Computerworld (where I have a monthly column and a blog). I realize that many of my newsletter readers prefer newsletters to blogs, RSS feeds, Twitter, and ChangeDetection.com. But these are all perfectly viable ways to reach out to you. And they&#039;re all completely free to me. Best of all, I don&#039;t have to spend 2-3 hours producing the newsletter.

-- Scot]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. From the tenor of the many emails I&#8217;ve been getting in response to this newsletter, you might think I was making a big change. Truth is, since I hadn&#8217;t mailed the newsletter in a long time, the decision was effectively made without foresight or intention. My belated decision to pull the plug was little more than a confirmation of the obvious.</p>
<p>I still plan to write here and at Computerworld (where I have a monthly column and a blog). I realize that many of my newsletter readers prefer newsletters to blogs, RSS feeds, Twitter, and ChangeDetection.com. But these are all perfectly viable ways to reach out to you. And they&#8217;re all completely free to me. Best of all, I don&#8217;t have to spend 2-3 hours producing the newsletter.</p>
<p>&#8211; Scot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Turning off the SNB Newsletter by kfm</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2010/05/26/turning-off-the-snb-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-3810</link>
		<dc:creator>kfm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 16:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=457#comment-3810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was pleased to get the email, even if it&#039;s the last. I&#039;ve been following you for many years and always enjoyed what you had to say. Glad things are going well with ComputerWorld :) Good luck with all that comes your way. Kevin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was pleased to get the email, even if it&#8217;s the last. I&#8217;ve been following you for many years and always enjoyed what you had to say. Glad things are going well with ComputerWorld <img src='http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Good luck with all that comes your way. Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Turning off the SNB Newsletter by KoHalas</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2010/05/26/turning-off-the-snb-newsletter/comment-page-1/#comment-3807</link>
		<dc:creator>KoHalas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 05:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=457#comment-3807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good luck Scot!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck Scot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac A-List Updated by madisonwalker</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2009/09/13/mac-a-list-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-3801</link>
		<dc:creator>madisonwalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 06:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=428#comment-3801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good list...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good list&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scot&#8217;s Crazy Email Saga by WVRich</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2009/09/13/scots-crazy-email-saga/comment-page-1/#comment-3794</link>
		<dc:creator>WVRich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=434#comment-3794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t remember how long I have used Eudora, but started with V3... I think.
Currently using 7.1.0.9 under XP. I haven&#039;t seen much progress with Mozilla&#039;s replacement, and recently ran across Pegasus(again). I will explore Pegasus, as it has one of the features that I like the most about Eudora, that of the mbx file format. I like being able to see what is in a message outside of the mail program. Anybody have any experience with Pegasus?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t remember how long I have used Eudora, but started with V3&#8230; I think.<br />
Currently using 7.1.0.9 under XP. I haven&#8217;t seen much progress with Mozilla&#8217;s replacement, and recently ran across Pegasus(again). I will explore Pegasus, as it has one of the features that I like the most about Eudora, that of the mbx file format. I like being able to see what is in a message outside of the mail program. Anybody have any experience with Pegasus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac A-List Updated by jcinpv</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2009/09/13/mac-a-list-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-3790</link>
		<dc:creator>jcinpv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 04:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=428#comment-3790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you need to re-assess Parallels and even enumerate your so-called &quot;fraught with bugs&quot; so we know just why you don&#039;t like it. The latest comparison with VMWare shows Parallels ahead in the most significant ways. I&#039;ve been using Parallels since just before version 5 came out, and version 5 is even better. I&#039;m running four different operating systems under Parallels (Windows XP, Windows 7, Ubuntu Linux, and Fedora Linux) and I have no complaints. I also have VMWare Fusion installed, and I do have complaints with that (specifically regarding accessing USB devices - it&#039;s not as clean as it is with Parallels).

And about your A-rating of Office for Mac 2008, haven&#039;t you heard of NeoOffice? I can&#039;t imagine why anyone would pay for something that they can get free that is just as good and in some ways more user friendly. I gave up Office for Mac two years ago and would not go back for anything. Everyone I introduce to NeoOffice can&#039;t thank me enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you need to re-assess Parallels and even enumerate your so-called &#8220;fraught with bugs&#8221; so we know just why you don&#8217;t like it. The latest comparison with VMWare shows Parallels ahead in the most significant ways. I&#8217;ve been using Parallels since just before version 5 came out, and version 5 is even better. I&#8217;m running four different operating systems under Parallels (Windows XP, Windows 7, Ubuntu Linux, and Fedora Linux) and I have no complaints. I also have VMWare Fusion installed, and I do have complaints with that (specifically regarding accessing USB devices &#8211; it&#8217;s not as clean as it is with Parallels).</p>
<p>And about your A-rating of Office for Mac 2008, haven&#8217;t you heard of NeoOffice? I can&#8217;t imagine why anyone would pay for something that they can get free that is just as good and in some ways more user friendly. I gave up Office for Mac two years ago and would not go back for anything. Everyone I introduce to NeoOffice can&#8217;t thank me enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update: Software Firewalls for Windows XP by Ashampoo Firewall Pro</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/04/02/update-software-firewalls-for-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-3157</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashampoo Firewall Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/04/02/update-software-firewalls-for-windows-xp/#comment-3157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Ashampoo Firewall Pro ...&lt;/strong&gt;

 I&#8217;ve been getting a lot of requests for an update on my research into software firewalls for  [...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ashampoo Firewall Pro &#8230;</strong></p>
<p> I&#8217;ve been getting a lot of requests for an update on my research into software firewalls for  [...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Testing 64-bit Vista and Windows 7 by Windows 7 Ultimate (64 bit)</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2009/03/08/testing-64-bit-vista-and-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-2983</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 Ultimate (64 bit)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=347#comment-2983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Windows 7 Ultimate (64 bit) ...&lt;/strong&gt;

 This story was significantly updated with added detail during the first 2.5 weeks after it was laun [...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Windows 7 Ultimate (64 bit) &#8230;</strong></p>
<p> This story was significantly updated with added detail during the first 2.5 weeks after it was laun [...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fast First Impressions of Windows 7 Gold by TanMan</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2009/09/13/fast-first-impressions-of-windows-7-gold/comment-page-1/#comment-2746</link>
		<dc:creator>TanMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=436#comment-2746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scot, I successfully installed Windows 7 x64 RTM on my Q6600 computer, although I did have to remove the overclocking to complete the install. This computer has an Intel chipset. That computer&#039;s been running great for a couple of weeks now.

I also successfully installed an earlier version of Windows 7 x64 as a dual-boot on another computer, an i7 720 with an Intel chipset. That also ran without a hitch.

Based on my results, my bud installed Windows 7 x64 RTM on his Q6600 computer. He&#039;s been having nothing but trouble - lockups on shut down, freezes, and worst of all, file copies from USB drives are failing.

It turns out he has a nForce chipset, and it appears Windows 7 x64 has a big problem with that particular chipset. Although Microsoft is now &quot;looking into it&quot;, there is no resolution as of yet.

The problem appears to be with the x64 version - the x86 version (32-bit) appears to work just fine with this chipset. My bud hasn&#039;t yet reinstalled to verify this, but I&#039;m sure he will this weekend.

TanMan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scot, I successfully installed Windows 7 x64 RTM on my Q6600 computer, although I did have to remove the overclocking to complete the install. This computer has an Intel chipset. That computer&#8217;s been running great for a couple of weeks now.</p>
<p>I also successfully installed an earlier version of Windows 7 x64 as a dual-boot on another computer, an i7 720 with an Intel chipset. That also ran without a hitch.</p>
<p>Based on my results, my bud installed Windows 7 x64 RTM on his Q6600 computer. He&#8217;s been having nothing but trouble &#8211; lockups on shut down, freezes, and worst of all, file copies from USB drives are failing.</p>
<p>It turns out he has a nForce chipset, and it appears Windows 7 x64 has a big problem with that particular chipset. Although Microsoft is now &#8220;looking into it&#8221;, there is no resolution as of yet.</p>
<p>The problem appears to be with the x64 version &#8211; the x86 version (32-bit) appears to work just fine with this chipset. My bud hasn&#8217;t yet reinstalled to verify this, but I&#8217;m sure he will this weekend.</p>
<p>TanMan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
