<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scot&#8217;s Newsletter mailed today (first time in 5 months)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/08/30/scots-newsletter-mailed-today-first-time-in-5-months/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/08/30/scots-newsletter-mailed-today-first-time-in-5-months/</link>
	<description>Operating systems. Broadband. Issues. Reviews ... tech info you can use.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scot</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/08/30/scots-newsletter-mailed-today-first-time-in-5-months/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=157#comment-802</guid>
		<description>Not going to happen, Mark. I write one blog. You're free not to read it, free to unsubscribe, whatever you want to do. This is what I write about.

Beg to differ on software firewalls using that many system resources. Did you actually try Online Armor? I'm guessing not. I have written extensively about hardware firewalls in the past, and this latest software firewall review specifically recommends that everyone use a hardware firewalls. I've also reviewed the SonicWall products in the past. I don't like them. They're expensive and don't really offer more than less expensive options. Hardware firewalls don't do much to block outbound connections. Try *reading* the story I wrote instead of mindlessly criticizing, please.

A hardware firewall for the road makes a ton of sense, though. It's the one thought I agree with. How large is it though? What are you looking at?

-- Scot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not going to happen, Mark. I write one blog. You&#8217;re free not to read it, free to unsubscribe, whatever you want to do. This is what I write about.</p>
<p>Beg to differ on software firewalls using that many system resources. Did you actually try Online Armor? I&#8217;m guessing not. I have written extensively about hardware firewalls in the past, and this latest software firewall review specifically recommends that everyone use a hardware firewalls. I&#8217;ve also reviewed the SonicWall products in the past. I don&#8217;t like them. They&#8217;re expensive and don&#8217;t really offer more than less expensive options. Hardware firewalls don&#8217;t do much to block outbound connections. Try *reading* the story I wrote instead of mindlessly criticizing, please.</p>
<p>A hardware firewall for the road makes a ton of sense, though. It&#8217;s the one thought I agree with. How large is it though? What are you looking at?</p>
<p>&#8211; Scot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark@benavides.org</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/08/30/scots-newsletter-mailed-today-first-time-in-5-months/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>mark@benavides.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=157#comment-800</guid>
		<description>I second the thought regarding automobile blogging.  Start a second blog for those interested in hearing about minimizing their automotive carbon footprint.  I'm here to keep the knuckleheads off my systems.  

And perhaps I've missed something, but I'd sure like to hear about REAL firewalls instead of software that makes my machines run akin to '286-10MHz machines of days past .    I run Sonicwalls at home and office and would like to see hardware firewalls compared.  I travel frequently, and am within a month or two of purchasing a hardware firewall 'for the road' rather than hope the hotel, motel, or business I'm piggybacking from has dotted it's technological i's and crossed it's t's.

Regards,
MarkB

Regards,
Mark B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second the thought regarding automobile blogging.  Start a second blog for those interested in hearing about minimizing their automotive carbon footprint.  I&#8217;m here to keep the knuckleheads off my systems.  </p>
<p>And perhaps I&#8217;ve missed something, but I&#8217;d sure like to hear about REAL firewalls instead of software that makes my machines run akin to &#8216;286-10MHz machines of days past .    I run Sonicwalls at home and office and would like to see hardware firewalls compared.  I travel frequently, and am within a month or two of purchasing a hardware firewall &#8216;for the road&#8217; rather than hope the hotel, motel, or business I&#8217;m piggybacking from has dotted it&#8217;s technological i&#8217;s and crossed it&#8217;s t&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
MarkB</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Mark B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/08/30/scots-newsletter-mailed-today-first-time-in-5-months/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=157#comment-796</guid>
		<description>Alec_Burgess:

CAPTCHAS: I don't control the WordPress software. There are add-ons, but my experience with add-ons is that they may be points of vulnerability.

About auto coverage and RSS feed: No, there's no non-auto RSS feed. I'm currently toting up the email-based votes (which I vastly prefer, by the way). Early results: More people would opt for me to send newsletters notifying them about auto coverage than those who would not. But it would have to be a mandate in favor of notification about auto coverage for me to consider it. People signed up with a specific expectation. I won't break that without an overwhelming number of people asking me to make a change.

There is no option about whether I cover autos or not -- I will continue to write about what I want to write about. Anyone who wants to &lt;em&gt;pay&lt;/em&gt; me directly for what I write might, I suppose, have an option to dictate that. (To be honest, I've never even considered that.) But I'm not looking for that business model. In fact, there is no business model for Scot's Newsletter.

-- Scot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alec_Burgess:</p>
<p>CAPTCHAS: I don&#8217;t control the WordPress software. There are add-ons, but my experience with add-ons is that they may be points of vulnerability.</p>
<p>About auto coverage and RSS feed: No, there&#8217;s no non-auto RSS feed. I&#8217;m currently toting up the email-based votes (which I vastly prefer, by the way). Early results: More people would opt for me to send newsletters notifying them about auto coverage than those who would not. But it would have to be a mandate in favor of notification about auto coverage for me to consider it. People signed up with a specific expectation. I won&#8217;t break that without an overwhelming number of people asking me to make a change.</p>
<p>There is no option about whether I cover autos or not &#8212; I will continue to write about what I want to write about. Anyone who wants to <em>pay</em> me directly for what I write might, I suppose, have an option to dictate that. (To be honest, I&#8217;ve never even considered that.) But I&#8217;m not looking for that business model. In fact, there is no business model for Scot&#8217;s Newsletter.</p>
<p>&#8211; Scot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/08/30/scots-newsletter-mailed-today-first-time-in-5-months/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=157#comment-795</guid>
		<description>FuturePerfect and others who may be confused, please see &lt;a href="http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/09/01/why-newsletter-readers-got-info-blog-readers-didnt/" rel="nofollow"&gt;this new blog entry&lt;/a&gt;.

-- Scot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FuturePerfect and others who may be confused, please see <a href="http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/09/01/why-newsletter-readers-got-info-blog-readers-didnt/" rel="nofollow">this new blog entry</a>.</p>
<p>&#8211; Scot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot’s Newsletter Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why newsletter readers got info that blog readers didn&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/08/30/scots-newsletter-mailed-today-first-time-in-5-months/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot’s Newsletter Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why newsletter readers got info that blog readers didn&#8217;t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=157#comment-794</guid>
		<description>[...] Scot’s Newsletter Blog Operating systems. Broadband. Issues. Reviews &#8230; tech info you can use.      &#171; Scot&#8217;s Newsletter mailed today (first time in 5 months) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scot’s Newsletter Blog Operating systems. Broadband. Issues. Reviews &#8230; tech info you can use.      &laquo; Scot&#8217;s Newsletter mailed today (first time in 5 months) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FuturePerfect</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/08/30/scots-newsletter-mailed-today-first-time-in-5-months/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>FuturePerfect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=157#comment-792</guid>
		<description>I'm confused.  I thought this blog IS your newsletter, replacing your old newsletter site which is now an archive.  And didn't you mean you e-mailed not [snail] mailed the newsletter?   And since you can't re-mail your newsletter, is it now unavailable to me forever?  Could you please explain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused.  I thought this blog IS your newsletter, replacing your old newsletter site which is now an archive.  And didn&#8217;t you mean you e-mailed not [snail] mailed the newsletter?   And since you can&#8217;t re-mail your newsletter, is it now unavailable to me forever?  Could you please explain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fox</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/08/30/scots-newsletter-mailed-today-first-time-in-5-months/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=157#comment-791</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott, good to hear from you again. Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott, good to hear from you again. Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnn1jm</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/08/30/scots-newsletter-mailed-today-first-time-in-5-months/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>johnn1jm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=157#comment-788</guid>
		<description>I sense from your emailed letter today that you only like a Mac because of security and you would stick with a PC if it wasnt for that. Only pulling your leg, but I would stick with a PC if it was a secure as a Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sense from your emailed letter today that you only like a Mac because of security and you would stick with a PC if it wasnt for that. Only pulling your leg, but I would stick with a PC if it was a secure as a Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec_Burgess</title>
		<link>http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/08/30/scots-newsletter-mailed-today-first-time-in-5-months/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec_Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/?p=157#comment-786</guid>
		<description>Posting at 2008-08-30 16:08 EDT (your newsletter received at 10:43) and apparently no comments posted yet.

Had to register to post - no CAPTCHA's? seemed too easy :-)
Response time immediate for all functions - everyone must be out enjoying the last days of summer.

wrt to Automobile blogging - I appreciate your enthusiasm but its not my passion. I've got an old clunker which suits me fine ... so voting no about hearing about cars. Is there a separate RSS feed which will get me *my* idea of good stuff and let others see the rest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posting at 2008-08-30 16:08 EDT (your newsletter received at 10:43) and apparently no comments posted yet.</p>
<p>Had to register to post - no CAPTCHA&#8217;s? seemed too easy <img src='http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Response time immediate for all functions - everyone must be out enjoying the last days of summer.</p>
<p>wrt to Automobile blogging - I appreciate your enthusiasm but its not my passion. I&#8217;ve got an old clunker which suits me fine &#8230; so voting no about hearing about cars. Is there a separate RSS feed which will get me *my* idea of good stuff and let others see the rest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
